PSCI 1101-104, 115: Mr. Jaeger
Response Paper Rubric and Topics
The following is a guideline to follow in preparing your response papers and lays out the expectations for effective writing in Mr. Jaeger’s recitations. Please use the rubric below to ensure you fulfill all of the requirements for the response papers, but understand that assessing writing is not a completely objective undertaking (Grades range from ‘A’ to ‘F’ and we only have three categories below!). The rubric is a guideline that I use in evaluating your response papers to have some objectivity. That being said, my subjective assessments of the depth of your thinking, the strength of your arguments, the quality of your support, and the overall quality of your thinking and writing will guide my final decision about your grade.
One comment on working with sources: As a guideline, please cite any ideas, statistics, evidence, or support that are not your own whether or not they are paraphrased or quoted. Please spend some time familiarizing yourself with two websites that are useful in explaining how and when to cite sources:
Working with Sources from Dartmouth College: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sources/
Citing Sources from the University of Colorado: http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/about/citing.htm
· Due Dates: Based on your depth of understanding of an issue or your own personal interests, you may select which weeks you would like to hand in your response papers within the following guidelines.
o All students must hand in one response paper no later than the week of October 15th. Papers are due at the beginning of recitation that week.
o All students must hand in their second response paper no later than the week of December 3rd. Papers are due at the beginning of recitation that week.
o Papers should be turned in via email and hard copy.
o You are strongly encouraged to hand in papers before the two final deadlines and to write the responses on the topics that interest you. Please manage your time well and hand in papers early to avoid a crunch around midterm exams. Papers will be returned at the end of the following week’s recitation section.
· Each paper should include a critique of an idea presented, an analysis of the importance or relevance of an issue covered in the recitation readings, and a discussion of further implications of the information presented. It should not be a summary of the material.
· The response papers do not require additional research but should reflect critical thinking and evaluation of the material presented.
· Each response paper should be 3 pages, double-spaced, 12 pt., Times New Roman font, 1” margins, with only your name, date, and recitation section single-spaced at the top.
Response Paper Rubric
Category |
Exemplary |
Acceptable |
Unacceptable |
|
Thesis and
Evidence |
Argument is
clear, specific, coherent, thought-provoking, and rigorous. Evidence is substantial (though not
excessive), relevant, and clearly connected to an argument. |
Thesis is
detectable though unrefined, lacks nuance, and/or broad. Evidence is connected to arguments though
either overwhelms or fails to substantiate the writer’s own thoughts. |
Unclear thesis or
stance that results in summary. Lack
of evidence from the readings and/or summary that does not represent
connection between an argument and the reading. |
|
Organization
and Logic |
Paper has a clear
introduction, body, and conclusion that flows logically from one thought to
the next. Paper builds logically from
a set of claims to supporting evidence to conclusions. |
Paper has an
introduction and body, though conclusion may be unclear or a simple
restatement of paper’s arguments.
Paper may be slightly disorganized in ordering of arguments. |
Introduction,
body, and/or conclusion are difficult to identify. Lack of clear organization within
paragraphs and between paragraphs distracts of paper’s argument. |
|
Grammar
and Mechanics |
Writing conforms
to expectations of proper grammar and mechanical conventions. Paper has zero misspellings, grammatical
errors, typos, or awkward constructions.
All verbs are in the appropriate tense. |
Writing conforms
to expectations of proper grammar and mechanical conventions. Paper has 1-2 misspellings, grammatical
errors, typos, or awkward constructions. All verbs are in the appropriate
tense. |
Writing conforms
to expectations of proper grammar and mechanical conventions. Paper has 3 or more misspellings,
grammatical errors, typos, or awkward constructions. |
|
Citations
and Formatting |
Author properly
cites (according to MLA or APA style) all unoriginal thought, data, quotes,
and paraphrased material. Paper is exactly
3 pages (not including title page), double-spaced, page numbered, 12 pt.
Times New Roman font with 1” margins on all sides. |
Author properly
cites (according to MLA or APA style) all unoriginal thought, data, quotes,
and paraphrased material. Paper is
exactly 3 pages (not including title page), double-spaced, page numbered, 12
pt. Times New Roman font with 1” margins on all sides. |
Author fails to
properly cite or follow expectations for page length, formatting, or is
shorter than paper expectation. |
|
Clarity
and Creativity |
Author clearly
expresses his/her ideas using the language of political science, proper
diction, and clear phrasing. Topic and
argument reflect creativity in the application of topics discussed in
recitation to new areas or points out interesting connections in concepts. |
Author expresses
his or her ideas using a minimum of trite language. Most ideas are clearly presented in
interesting ways. Author is somewhat
creative in response, though may engage in a minimum of simple clarification
of ideas in recitation readings. |
Awkward
constructions and/or colloquialisms exist throughout paper. Response reflects a minimum of creative
thought and engages in summary or restatement of ideas already discussed. |
Prompts for Paper Topics
·
(Weeks 1-4) Given the state of contemporary American society (i.e.
current events, current public policy debates, relationship between branches of
government, the level of government, etc.), to what extent did the Framers of
the Constitution solve the collective action problems they set out to
answer? What role does Federalism
continue to play in resolving these collective action problems? More specifically, you may choose a current
debate in public policy (from our readings, the Fiorina textbook, the news,
with my help, etc.) and evaluate whether or not the institutions and political
system created under the Constitution is helpful in resolving the dilemma.
·
(Weeks 5 & 6) Many have argued that the story of American
history has been the progressive extension of civil rights and civil liberties
to previously excluded groups. What
Constitutional concerns still persist in protecting civil rights and civil
liberties? What segments of American
society remain susceptible to infringements on civil rights and civil liberties
and what can be done about it?
·
(Weeks 7-10) You are asked in the middle part of the course to
examine the institutions that define the American political system: Congress, The Presidency, The Bureaucracy,
The Judiciary. Compared to the Framers’
vision of the distribution and extent of powers for the national government,
what changes have we seen in both the perceived and actual powers of these
institutions? OR Select two institutions and explain what
resources (formal powers, informal powers, monetary, relationship to other
branches, etc.) they have available to accomplish their agendas and evaluate
the extent of those institutions’ power to shape public policy compared to
others. More specifically, you could
choose a current public policy issue (from our texts or the news) and consider
how at least two of the institutions we examine are attempting to shape the
outcome of the debate: what is the
issue? How does each institution you
have chosen accomplish its agenda? What
constraints exist on the institutions in trying to accomplish its goals?
·
(Weeks 11-16) Several non-institutional factors can have powerful
influences in shaping policy outcomes.
In the last section of the course, you are asked to examine the role of
Public Opinion, the News Media, Voting, Political Parties, and Interest Groups in
the American political system. Select two of these influential methods of
shaping political outcomes and complete the following: 1) Identify the methods
by which the non-institutional factors shape policy and 2) Evaluate which group (of all the groups) has the
most power in shaping policy compared with which you believe should have the greatest impact.