Eastern and Western Africa Discussion                                                                        Michael Chambers

PSCI 4783           

SUMMARY OF:                                                                                                                  10/12/05

The ECOWAS: From Regional Economic Organization to Regional Peacekeeper

Peter M. Dennis and M. Leann Brown

From CRI: pp. 229-246

 

All information below was borrowed from this source in order to provide a concise summary of the reading.

 

Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)

 

In 1990 ECOWAS took on the task of peacekeeping in the Liberian civil war.

 

Currently ECOWAS is comprised of 15 member states: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d'Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Togo.

 

Former Colonial States

Francophone States (French): Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo

Anglophone States (British): Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone

Lusophone States (Portuguese?): Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau

 

History of ECOWAS and ECOMOG:

 

ECOWAS aimed to accelerate economic development and to pursue policies of regional self-reliance.

-          Stated Objectives

o        Enhance and liberalize trade allowing free movement of goods, persons, capital

o        Improve transportation and coordinate telecommunications (Infrastructure)

o        Promote industrial and agricultural growth

o        Increase and maintain citizens standard of living and economic stability

 

-          Constraints that were facing people in West Africa prior to the ECOWAS

o        Africans had to make connecting flights in Europe to fly to neighboring African countries

o        National policies didn’t let skilled workers migrate

o        Countries often refused to share status and prices of stocks to foreigners

 

-          Political Obstacles that hindered the ECOWAS upon its formation

o        Changes in member state leadership

o        Lack of democratic governance

 

-          Economic Obstacles that hindered the ECOWAS upon its formation

o        Diversity of currencies with complex exchange controls

o        Low levels of intra-regional trade and intra-regional communication

o        Competition between national economies

o        Disparity among members (size, population, economic development)

 

ECOWAS has not been very successful since it began in 1975

 

Liberian Civil War (1989):

 

The National Patriotic Front of Liberia, NPFL, launched a small attack at the Liberian-Cote d’Ivoire border

-          Advanced towards Liberia’s capital (Monrovia), by 1990 they controlled 90% of the country

-          Their objective was to overthrow the autocratic regime of President Doe

 

The ECOWAS convened a summit almost immediately to consider the escalating violence in Liberia

-          Created a Standing Mediation Committee (SMC) to foster a settlement of the conflict

o        The most powerful Anglophone states made up the SMC

o        Francophone states like Mali and Togo were not among the powerful

-          For 3 weeks in July, 1990, the SMC and reps from all warring factions met to work out a settlement.

o        No peaceful end was realized

o        The SMC responded by creating the ECOWAS Cease-Fire Monitoring Group (ECOMOG)

-          ECOMOG

o        Many ECOWAS members were concerned about the safety of citizens and nationals

§         Nigeria went ahead with ECOMOG deployment before gaining political support

§         Francophone members of the SMC (Mali and Togo) would not send troops

§         Cote d’Ivoire and Senegal expressed reservations about the ECOMOG operation

o        ECOMOG was seen by critics as an ECOWAS act to prevent the overthrow of Doe

 

Why did ECOWAS Embrace Regional Peacekeeping?

 

ECOMOG Could Have Been an Expression of Nigeria’s Hegemonic Aspirations.

-          Nigeria had trouble addressing basic human needs within its country

o        Yet Nigerian troops committed more troops and more money than anyone else

o        Nigeria would have had an easier time, and spent less money if they entered unilaterally...

 

Spontaneous Spillover Could Explain ECOWAS Peacekeeping Role

-          Spontaneous spillover consists of the inherent functional linkage of tasks

-          The war in Liberia presented the greatest threat to regional stability

-          ECOWAS made the “natural” choice to encourage peace and to protect their institution

 

Cultivated Spillover Could Explain ECOWAS Peacekeeping Role

-          Cultivated spillover consists of the deliberate linkage of tasks

-          ECOWAS may have entered because they were the only option left

o        They might have otherwise preferred intervention from global powers

o        They may have decided to intervene for humanitarian reasons

 

Regional Peacekeeping vs. Global Organizations Assigning Peacekeepers:

 

-          Regional actors have a better understanding of the conflict

o        This may be a disadvantage since neutrality is usually essential for peacekeeping

-          Regional peacekeepers share history, culture, identity with combatants, so they possess legitimacy

o        Common history and culture is not enough in Africa.  There are too many forms of mixed colonial heritage.  There is not automatic/inherent legitimacy.

o        Consequently, regional peacekeepers are not neutral as global forces might be

-          Regional actors want stability due to geographic proximity/economic interdependence in the area

-          Regional actors may generate greater consensus for action than would organizations like the UN

o        Incentives to create long-term peace and stability, and to generate a consensus to act, may be confused, or possibly intertwined with, hegemonic regional interests.

o        ECOMOG was hampered by rumors that it was a Nigerian hegemonic power play

o        Many feared that ECOMOG was interested in what was best for Nigeria, not for peace

-          Regional peacekeepers have more suitable equipment and people for battlefield conditions

o        This equipment is often outdated and scarce

o        Often, weapons came from First World (equipment used by international peacekeepers)

o        Africa’s climate and environment is extremely varied, diverse,  and unpredictable

 

 

Conclusions:

 

ECOWAS was mostly ineffective

ECOWAS took on the peacekeeping role in Liberia due to powerful incentive provided by regional chaos.


Eastern and Western Africa Discussion                                                                        Michael Chambers

                                                                                                                                                PSCI 4783

SUMMARY OF:                                                                                                                  10/12/05                                           East African Monetary Union: 

The Domestic Politics of Institutional Survival and Dissolution

Scott Cooper and Clark Asay

 

All information below was borrowed from this source in order to provide a concise summary of the reading.

 

Main Question:

By looking at the evolution of the Uganda, Tanzania, and Kenya within the East African Monetary Union, can we discover why some newly independent countries choose to develop an independent national currency while others maintain regional currency institutions?

 

The East African Monetary Union:

-          Regional currency institution made up of three countries (Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya)

o        Significant form of regionalism because

§         Currency control is closely linked to ideas of sovereignty and nationalism

§         National currency is a powerful symbol of the sovereign nation-state

§         However, many newly independent states chose not to issue their own currency

 

Cooper and Asay Argue That:

**           Governments maintain regional currencies only when past institutions have created a domestic political constituency for continued regionalism.

 

**           Governments choose to maintain regional currencies only when history has made them politically dependent on a continuing stream of benefits from past (colonial) regional institutions.

 

**           Political dependence is a function of the need for economic revenues, military protection etc.

 

**           Economic benefits alone are not a sufficient reason for governments to go with regionalism.  The

economic benefits need to strengthen the political constituencies of the government.

               

Political Economy and Path Dependence[1] are crucial factors in terms of regional integration

 

Regional Institutions in East Africa:

-          Upon colonizing the East African region in nineteenth century, Britain linked Kenya, Uganda, and what is now Tanzania in order to maximize economic benefits

-          Kenya was the main producing center for the region, Uganda/Tanzania provided raw materials

-          Kenya became the region’s economic hegemon

o        After Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania achieved independence in the early 1960’s

§         They at first agreed to cooperate within their colonial currency board

§         Negotiations over a more permanent cooperation broke down in 1965

o        Regional currency board was dissolved, and all three issued separate national currencies.

o        1967: Uganda, Tanzania, and Kenya form the East African Community (EAC)

§         1971: The three countries undermined the union by imposing exchange controls

§         1977: Currency union collapses, full exchange controls put into place

 

(In comparison to the regional currency institution-building in places such as the West African (francophone) zone, the East African monetary union had a rocky beginning and a short life.)

 

Causes of the stop & go cooperation between Tanzania, Uganda, and Kenya:

-          Function of the weak commitment to regionalism by the Kenyan and Tanzanian governments

o        Neither received enough political benefit from integration to justify the political costs

o        Uganda was desperate, but couldn’t establish regional institutions by itself

o        Had trouble consolidating political power in the unstable post-independence environment

-          As a result, regional cooperation died when national priorities outweighed regional ones

-          East African monetary union was weaker than many other currency unions

o        It was a regional union because the three currencies were kept at a fixed parity

§         However, each country had its own central bank and issued its own notes

§         Allowed countries to preserve a symbol of national independence

§         Even while cooperating, separate central banks provided the ability to separate at any moment, no matter how closely linked

 

(Overall, the three countries had a strong preference for national autonomy over regionalism.)

 

Explaining Regional Monetary Cooperation:

Economic Theory

-          The most common theoretical approach to explaining regional monetary cooperation

-          National Currency vs. Regional Currency Union

o        Benefits to having a separate national currency

o        Detriments to having a separate national currency

-          Optimum Currency Area theory: interdependent regions are likely to pursue regional currencies.

o        OCA theory is not a good predictor of currency cooperation beyond West Europe

§         The least interdependent regions have high/strong levels of cooperation

§         There is a problem of governmental uncertainty

§         Ignores domestic political situations

 

Political Economy and Path Dependence

Internal Benefits of a National Currency

o        Creates a sense of national unity and identity

o        A divided country can be united by having a common, national

§         Political gain is magnified if the government creates the national currency

§         It serves as a symbol of the government’s success in achieving independence

External Benefits of a National Currency

o        An independent, separate national currency emphasizes independence and sovereignty

 

Regional currencies may have greater political appeal of a national currency

o        May provide resources necessary for a national government to survive

o        These resources could be of an economic nature, military nature, or otherwise

 

(By looking at the political environment created by pre-independence regionalism, and inherited by post-independence governments, continuity and change in regional currency institutions can be explained.)

 

Desperate Uganda:

Domestic turbulence in Uganda made the country incompatible with the other two countries.  Due to domestic responsibilities, Uganda paid little attention to the EAC.

 

Ambivalent Kenya:

Regionalism could not benefit Kenya if Uganda and Tanzania were not cooperating.  Although the EAC had been in line with Kenya’s domestic political agenda, it was no longer attractive when the other two countries stopped collaborating.

 

Resentful Tanzania:

As Tanzania’s domestic socialist development increased, it had little need for continued regionalism.

 

 

Conclusions:

 

Member countries’ domestic policies at the time of independence can help us understand why some regional institutions survive and why others collapse. 

 

Domestic political fortunes are the most important factor when determining whether to pursue regionalism

Economic costs and benefits cannot explain the political patchwork pattern of choices.

 

Since economic cost-benefit tradeoff is uncertain, the crucial tradeoff when deciding between a national currency and a regional currency, is political:  A government must weigh currency sovereignty and nationalism against domestic political survival.

 

In all cases, the choice of currency institutions involved economic considerations, but these considerations were only weighed if they were beneficial politically.

 

The presence of earlier regional institutions does not determine the choices of newly independent governments.  Previous regional institutions merely ensure that regionalism is an option that is available

 

Path dependence is determined by the mechanism of political economy

 

 



[1] Path Dependence: A way to narrow a choice set and link decision making through time. It is not a story of inevitability in which the past neatly predicts the future.  This article argues that a newly-independent government’s political economy gives a general idea of how dependent they are on the path that has been set for the country.